linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of: property: special #nvmem-cell-cells handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+CT00AHOK8Nxe_kUa6F_OcgxW4BL10iWWwKCJNwbTsAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:44:26 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: property: special #nvmem-cell-cells handling

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 4:03 PM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
>
> Am 2022-11-18 22:52, schrieb Rob Herring:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 3:40 PM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
> >>
> >> Since recently, there is a new #nvmem-cell-cells. To be backwards
> >> compatible this is optional. Therefore, we need special handling and
> >> cannot use DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP() anymore.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> >> ---
> >> This patch will be part of the following series:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20221118185118.1190044-1-michael@walle.cc/
> >>
> >>  drivers/of/property.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> >> index 967f79b59016..93c0ea662336 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> >> @@ -1305,7 +1305,6 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(dmas, "dmas", "#dma-cells")
> >>  DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(power_domains, "power-domains",
> >> "#power-domain-cells")
> >>  DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(hwlocks, "hwlocks", "#hwlock-cells")
> >>  DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(extcon, "extcon", NULL)
> >> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(nvmem_cells, "nvmem-cells", NULL)
> >>  DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(phys, "phys", "#phy-cells")
> >>  DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(wakeup_parent, "wakeup-parent", NULL)
> >>  DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl0, "pinctrl-0", NULL)
> >> @@ -1381,6 +1380,22 @@ static struct device_node
> >> *parse_interrupts(struct device_node *np,
> >>         return of_irq_parse_one(np, index, &sup_args) ? NULL :
> >> sup_args.np;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static struct device_node *parse_nvmem_cells(struct device_node *np,
> >> +                                            const char *prop_name,
> >> int index)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
> >> +
> >> +       if (strcmp(prop_name, "nvmem-cells"))
> >> +               return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +       if (of_parse_phandle_with_optional_args(np, prop_name,
> >> +                                               "#nvmem-cell-cells",
> >> index,
> >> +                                               &sup_args))
> >> +               return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +       return sup_args.np;
> >> +}
> >
> > There's a couple of other cases like that (MSI IIRC), so can we
> > generalize this to work in more than 1 case?
>
> You mean addding a new DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP_OPTIONAL_ARGS()?

Actually, I think you can just do something like the below. I don't
think we need to separately handle an optional #.*-cells and a
required one. It's really just validation which we do already both
with the tools and when the subsystems parse these bindings. Of
course, if we need to handle cases other than 0 default cells, we'll
have to restructure the define some to pass the default cells.

diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index 967f79b59016..198f56633eb0 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ static struct device_node
*parse_suffix_prop_cells(struct device_node *np,
        if (strcmp_suffix(prop_name, suffix))
                return NULL;

-       if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, prop_name, cells_name, index,
+       if (__of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, prop_name, cells_name, 0, index,
                                       &sup_args))
                return NULL;