[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3xkaaioFNVQtN8q@ziqianlu-desk2>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:55:53 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: async unthrottling for cfs bandwidth
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:31:20AM -0800, Josh Don wrote:
> > Please test the final version as found here:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/commit/?h=sched/core&id=4e3c1b7b489e218dfa576cd6af0680b975b8743e
>
> Thanks Peter, the patch looks good to me and continues to work
> correctly. Note that I needed to make two edits to get it to build
> though on sched/core:
>
> - local_cfq_rq doesn't match variable name used in function (local_unthrottle)
> - rq_lock_irqrestore -> rq_unlock_irqrestore
I also tested it on a desktop bare metal with 800 cgroups under 2
cgroups that have quota set. Before this patch, the majority of durations
for sched_cfs_period_timer() are in the range of 512us-1ms, with outliers
in the range of 1ms-4ms; after this patch, the majority are in the range
of 128us-512us with no outliers above 512us.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists