[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221122061158.GA14175@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:11:58 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-mapping tree with Linus'
tree
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:06:11AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks Stephen,
the fix look good. The being said the code in the sound tree here
is questionable to start with:
> #ifdef CONFIG_SND_DMA_SGBUF
> + if (!sgt && !get_dma_ops(dmab->dev.dev)) {
> if (dmab->dev.type == SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV_WC_SG)
> dmab->dev.type = SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV_WC_SG_FALLBACK;
> else
driver have no busuness calling get_dma_ops and poking into the
dma-mapping internals.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists