[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f95ef7b7-cc23-9fed-5d05-1aa66aaeb86a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:02:04 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: afaerber@...e.de, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, festevam@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-imx@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
liviu.dudau@....com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, mani@...nel.org,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, richard.genoud@...il.com,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
tklauser@...tanz.ch, vz@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] tty: serial: use uart_port_tx() helper
Hi,
On 21. 11. 22, 21:27, Michael Walle wrote:
> This will break serial output for the userspace on my board
> (arch/arm/boot/dts/lan966x-kontron-kswitch-d10-mmt*dts). The uart_port_tx()
> helper will call __port->ops->stop_tx(__port) if uart_circ_chars_pending()
> returns 0. But the code above, doesn't do that. In fact, removing the
> stop_tx() call in the helper macro, will fix the console output.
>
> Any ideas how to fix that?
Hm, so ATMEL_US_TXRDY is removed from tx_done_mask in stop_tx, but not
added back in start_tx. So the tx interrupt is never handled (the tx
tasklet is not scheduled to send the queue chars) in
atmel_handle_transmit().
Any chance, the below fixes it?
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
index 11bf2466390e..395370e0c77b 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
@@ -596,6 +596,8 @@ static void atmel_start_tx(struct uart_port *port)
/* re-enable PDC transmit */
atmel_uart_writel(port, ATMEL_PDC_PTCR, ATMEL_PDC_TXTEN);
+ atmel_port->tx_done_mask |= ATMEL_US_TXRDY;
+
/* Enable interrupts */
atmel_uart_writel(port, ATMEL_US_IER, atmel_port->tx_done_mask);
thanks,
--
js
Powered by blists - more mailing lists