[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3waS1oq4BmitGLT@codewreck.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:39:39 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
GUO Zihua <guozihua@...wei.com>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] 9p/xen: check logical size for buffer size
Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:35:56PM +0100:
> Looks good (except of s/rreq/req/ mentioned by Stefano already).
Thanks for the review (I've taken this as a 'reviewed-by' under the
assumption of that fix, sorry for being a bit aggressive at collecting
these -- I'd rather overcredit work being done than the other way around)
I'll send this and the three other commits in my 9p-next branch to Linus
tomorrow around this time:
https://github.com/martinetd/linux/commits/9p-next
> > memcpy(&req->rc, &h, sizeof(h));
>
> Is that really OK?
>
> 1. `h` is of type xen_9pfs_header and declared as packed, whereas `rc` is of
> type p9_fcall not declared as packed.
>
> 2. Probably a bit dangerous to assume the layout of xen_9pfs_header being in
> sync with the starting layout of p9_fcall without any compile-time
> assertion?
I've done this in a follow up that will be sent to Linus later as per
Stefano's suggestion.
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists