[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fd4d4f0-eade-3496-1b03-d980b190b3d5@starfivetech.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:30:07 +0800
From: Walker Chen <walker.chen@...rfivetech.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add StarFive JH7110 power
domain definitions
On 2022/11/22 16:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/11/2022 08:46, Walker Chen wrote:
>> On 2022/11/21 18:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 18/11/2022 14:32, Walker Chen wrote:
>>>> Add power domain definitions for the StarFive JH7110 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Walker Chen <walker.chen@...rfivetech.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/dt-bindings/power/jh7110-power.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/jh7110-power.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/jh7110-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/jh7110-power.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..24160c46fbaf
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/jh7110-power.h
>>>
>>> Filename matching compatible or bindings file.
>>
>> So the file name should be changed to "starfive,jh7110-power.h" and the compatible in the driver
>> should also be changed to "starfive,jh7110-power". Is it right ?
>
> I said filename should be changed. I don't remember what was your
> compatible, but if I did not comment there, in means it looked fine.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0) */
>>>
>>> Dual license for bindings.
>>
>> Ok, the license will be changed to GPL-2.0 or MIT in the patch v2.
>
> Any reasons why not using the licenses recommended by checkpatch?
>
Well, it sounds like a better way to decide which license to use by checkpatch.
Thanks for your tip.
Best Regards,
Walker Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists