lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86fse9ok3y.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:50:41 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        youlin.pei@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] irqchip: irq-mtk-cirq: Move register offsets to const array

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:22:48 +0000,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
> 
> In preparation to add support for new SoCs having a different
> register layout, add an enumeration that documents register
> offsets and move the definitions for the same to a u32 array;
> 
> Selecting the right register offsets array is done by adding an
> of_device_id array containing all of the currently supported
> compatible strings pointing to the "v1" offsets array (as data):
> since no devicetree declares the `mediatek,mtk-cirq` compatible
> without a SoC-specific one, it wasn't necessary to provide any
> legacy fallback.
> 
> Every usage of the aforemementioned definitions was changed to
> get a register address through a newly introduced `mtk_cirq_reg()`
> accessor.
> 
> This change brings no functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-cirq.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-cirq.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-cirq.c
> index 9bca0918078e..4d873d2ba0fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-cirq.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-cirq.c
> @@ -15,14 +15,29 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>  
> -#define CIRQ_ACK	0x40
> -#define CIRQ_MASK_SET	0xc0
> -#define CIRQ_MASK_CLR	0x100
> -#define CIRQ_SENS_SET	0x180
> -#define CIRQ_SENS_CLR	0x1c0
> -#define CIRQ_POL_SET	0x240
> -#define CIRQ_POL_CLR	0x280
> -#define CIRQ_CONTROL	0x300
> +enum mtk_cirq_reg_index {
> +	CIRQ_STA,
> +	CIRQ_ACK,
> +	CIRQ_MASK_SET,
> +	CIRQ_MASK_CLR,
> +	CIRQ_SENS_SET,
> +	CIRQ_SENS_CLR,
> +	CIRQ_POL_SET,
> +	CIRQ_POL_CLR,
> +	CIRQ_CONTROL
> +};
> +
> +static const u32 mtk_cirq_regs_v1[] = {

Again: this contains offsets, not registers. Consistency matters.

> +	[CIRQ_STA]	= 0x0,
> +	[CIRQ_ACK]	= 0x40,
> +	[CIRQ_MASK_SET]	= 0xc0,
> +	[CIRQ_MASK_CLR]	= 0x100,
> +	[CIRQ_SENS_SET]	= 0x180,
> +	[CIRQ_SENS_CLR]	= 0x1c0,
> +	[CIRQ_POL_SET]	= 0x240,
> +	[CIRQ_POL_CLR]	= 0x280,
> +	[CIRQ_CONTROL]	= 0x300,
> +};
>  
>  #define CIRQ_EN	0x1
>  #define CIRQ_EDGE	0x2
> @@ -32,18 +47,28 @@ struct mtk_cirq_chip_data {
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	unsigned int ext_irq_start;
>  	unsigned int ext_irq_end;
> +	const u32 *offsets;
>  	struct irq_domain *domain;
>  };
>  
>  static struct mtk_cirq_chip_data *cirq_data;
>  
> -static void mtk_cirq_write_mask(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int offset)
> +static inline void __iomem *mtk_cirq_reg(struct mtk_cirq_chip_data *chip_data,

Drop the inline. That's for the compiler to figure it out.

> +					 enum mtk_cirq_reg_index idx,
> +					 unsigned int cirq_num)

What does cirq_num mean for registers that are not relative to an
interrupt? Create a separate helper for those.

> +{
> +	void __iomem *reg = chip_data->base + chip_data->offsets[idx];
> +
> +	return reg + (cirq_num / 32) * 4;
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_cirq_write_mask(struct irq_data *data, enum mtk_cirq_reg_index idx)
>  {
>  	struct mtk_cirq_chip_data *chip_data = data->chip_data;
>  	unsigned int cirq_num = data->hwirq;
>  	u32 mask = 1 << (cirq_num % 32);
>  
> -	writel_relaxed(mask, chip_data->base + offset + (cirq_num / 32) * 4);
> +	writel_relaxed(mask, mtk_cirq_reg(chip_data, idx, cirq_num));
>  }
>  
>  static void mtk_cirq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> @@ -160,6 +185,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops cirq_domain_ops = {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int mtk_cirq_suspend(void)
>  {
> +	void __iomem *reg;
>  	u32 value, mask;
>  	unsigned int irq, hwirq_num;
>  	bool pending, masked;
> @@ -200,31 +226,34 @@ static int mtk_cirq_suspend(void)
>  				continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		reg = mtk_cirq_reg(cirq_data, CIRQ_ACK, i);
>  		mask = 1 << (i % 32);
> -		writel_relaxed(mask, cirq_data->base + CIRQ_ACK + (i / 32) * 4);
> +		writel_relaxed(mask, reg);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* set edge_only mode, record edge-triggerd interrupts */
>  	/* enable cirq */
> -	value = readl_relaxed(cirq_data->base + CIRQ_CONTROL);
> +	reg = mtk_cirq_reg(cirq_data, CIRQ_CONTROL, 0);
> +	value = readl_relaxed(reg);
>  	value |= (CIRQ_EDGE | CIRQ_EN);
> -	writel_relaxed(value, cirq_data->base + CIRQ_CONTROL);
> +	writel_relaxed(value, reg);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void mtk_cirq_resume(void)
>  {
> +	void __iomem *reg = mtk_cirq_reg(cirq_data, CIRQ_CONTROL, 0);
>  	u32 value;
>  
>  	/* flush recorded interrupts, will send signals to parent controller */
> -	value = readl_relaxed(cirq_data->base + CIRQ_CONTROL);
> -	writel_relaxed(value | CIRQ_FLUSH, cirq_data->base + CIRQ_CONTROL);
> +	value = readl_relaxed(reg);
> +	writel_relaxed(value | CIRQ_FLUSH, reg);
>  
>  	/* disable cirq */
> -	value = readl_relaxed(cirq_data->base + CIRQ_CONTROL);
> +	value = readl_relaxed(reg);
>  	value &= ~(CIRQ_EDGE | CIRQ_EN);
> -	writel_relaxed(value, cirq_data->base + CIRQ_CONTROL);
> +	writel_relaxed(value, reg);
>  }
>  
>  static struct syscore_ops mtk_cirq_syscore_ops = {
> @@ -240,10 +269,18 @@ static void mtk_cirq_syscore_init(void)
>  static inline void mtk_cirq_syscore_init(void) {}
>  #endif
>  
> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_cirq_of_match[] = {

Can't this be made __initconst?

> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-cirq", .data = &mtk_cirq_regs_v1 },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-cirq", .data = &mtk_cirq_regs_v1 },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-cirq", .data = &mtk_cirq_regs_v1 },
> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +
>  static int __init mtk_cirq_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>  				   struct device_node *parent)
>  {
>  	struct irq_domain *domain, *domain_parent;
> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>  	unsigned int irq_num;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -274,6 +311,13 @@ static int __init mtk_cirq_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_unmap;
>  
> +	match = of_match_node(mtk_cirq_of_match, node);
> +	if (!match) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out_unmap;
> +	}

Can't you perform this before mapping the MMIO region and allocating
memory? If you must fail, fail early.

> +	cirq_data->offsets = match->data;
> +
>  	irq_num = cirq_data->ext_irq_end - cirq_data->ext_irq_start + 1;
>  	domain = irq_domain_add_hierarchy(domain_parent, 0,
>  					  irq_num, node,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ