lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:58:06 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Owen Yang <ecs.taipeikernel@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, Harvey <hunge@...gle.com>,
        Bob Moragues <moragues@...omium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add DT for
 sc7280-herobrine-zombie

On 23/11/2022 15:39, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 06:11:13PM +0800, Owen Yang wrote:
> 
>> Subject: [2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add DT for sc7280-herobrine-zombie
> 
> Please in include a version number for versions >1. If my accounting is correct
> this is v3, so the next iteration should be v4.
> 
> You mentioned earlier that you are using patman. Add the following tag to
> one of the patches in the series to get the version included in the subject:
> 
> Series-version: 4

It is a bit surprise that this patch is a v4...  because I do not
remember v1 and v2... and v3. And no wonder since I was not CC-ed :/

It still surprised me how many people just cannot use
scripts/get_maintainers.pl. Everywhere, in each company. There is a tool
which they claim to use but they don't... or they base their patches on
one year old kernel which is another surprise...


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ