linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v8 03/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration feature flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW3PR12MB455343BD255A97AC8F1FD8D8950C9@MW3PR12MB4553.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:16:07 +0000
From:   "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
To:     Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        "rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com" <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        "songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "jpoimboe@...nel.org" <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "chang.seok.bae@...el.com" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        "pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com" 
        <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        "jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        "daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com" <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Das1, Sandipan" <Sandipan.Das@....com>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bagasdotme@...il.com" <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        "eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 03/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring Event
 Configuration feature flag

[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Hi Reinette,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 6:09 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@....com>; corbet@....net;
> tglx@...utronix.de; mingo@...hat.com; bp@...en8.de
> Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com; dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com; x86@...nel.org;
> hpa@...or.com; paulmck@...nel.org; akpm@...ux-foundation.org;
> quic_neeraju@...cinc.com; rdunlap@...radead.org;
> damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com; songmuchun@...edance.com;
> peterz@...radead.org; jpoimboe@...nel.org; pbonzini@...hat.com;
> chang.seok.bae@...el.com; pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com;
> jmattson@...gle.com; daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com; Das1, Sandipan
> <Sandipan.Das@....com>; tony.luck@...el.com; james.morse@....com;
> linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> bagasdotme@...il.com; eranian@...gle.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring
> Event Configuration feature flag
> 
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On 11/4/2022 1:00 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> > Newer AMD processors support the new feature Bandwidth Monitoring
> > Event Configuration (BMEC).
> >
> > The feature support is identified via CPUID Fn8000_0020_EBX_x0 (ECX=0).
> > Bits    Field Name    Description
> > 3       EVT_CFG       Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration (BMEC)
> >
> > Currently, the bandwidth monitoring events mbm_total_bytes and
> > mbm_local_bytes are set to count all the total and local reads/writes
> > respectively. With the introduction of slow memory, the two counters
> > are not enough to count all the different types of memory events. With
> > the feature BMEC, the users have the option to configure
> > mbm_total_bytes and mbm_local_bytes to count the specific type of
> > events.
> >
> > Each BMEC event has a configuration MSR, QOS_EVT_CFG (0xc000_0400h +
> > EventID) which contains one field for each bandwidth type that can be
> 
> Looking at later patches it seems that it is not really 0xc000_0400h + EventID
> but instead "0xc000_0400h + index_based_on_EventID"? This may be too much
> detail for this changelog so maybe these specifics can be deferred and just
> refer to the "configuration MSR".
Sure.
> 
> > used to configure the bandwidth event to track any combination of
> > supported bandwidth types. The event will count requests from every
> > bandwidth type bit that is set in the corresponding configuration
> > register.
> >
> > Following are the types of events supported:
> >
> > ====    ========================================================
> > Bits    Description
> > ====    ========================================================
> > 6       Dirty Victims from the QOS domain to all types of memory
> > 5       Reads to slow memory in the non-local NUMA domain
> > 4       Reads to slow memory in the local NUMA domain
> > 3       Non-temporal writes to non-local NUMA domain
> > 2       Non-temporal writes to local NUMA domain
> > 1       Reads to memory in the non-local NUMA domain
> > 0       Reads to memory in the local NUMA domain
> > ====    ========================================================
> >
> > By default, the mbm_total_bytes configuration is set to 0x7F to count
> > all the event types and the mbm_local_bytes configuration is set to
> > 0x15 to count all the local memory events.
> >
> > Feature description is available in the specification, "AMD64
> > Technology Platform Quality of Service Extensions, Revision: 1.03
> > Publication
> >
> > Link:
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > amd.com%2Fen%2Fsupport%2Ftech-docs%2Famd64-technology-platform-
> quality
> > -service-
> extensions&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbabu.moger%40amd.com%7Cb1bc7003
> >
> 552c454ebd7108dacce701e2%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%
> 7C0%7C
> >
> 638047589785935363%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMD
> AiLCJQIjo
> >
> iV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdat
> a=rzAi
> > HpRRXRNE37bfTt318tSj4sMhBXftW9inSi30rFk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > Link:
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugz
> >
> illa.kernel.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D206537&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbab
> u.m
> >
> oger%40amd.com%7Cb1bc7003552c454ebd7108dacce701e2%7C3dd8961fe488
> 4e608e
> >
> 11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638047589785935363%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb
> GZsb3d8ey
> >
> JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7
> C300
> >
> 0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=ghlUpN23gdyaJ7FZQFGgJTZOgo4LNJaE5JFLa1ezaTw
> %3D&am
> > p;reserved=0
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h |    1 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c   |    1 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c    |    1 +
> >  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > index d68b4c9c181d..6732ca0117be 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE	(11*32+17) /* "" Fill RSB on
> VM exit when EIBRS is enabled */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH		(11*32+18) /* "" Call depth
> tracking for RSB stuffing */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_SMBA		(11*32+19) /* Slow Memory
> Bandwidth Allocation */
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_BMEC		(11*32+20) /* AMD
> Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration (BMEC) */
> 
> Surely a nitpick but it is strange that the two features introduced in this series
> are described differently. Why does SMBA deserve the "AMD" prefix but BMEC
> does not? I do not think the "(BMEC)" is necessary since it is in
> X86_FEATURE_BMEC.

Sure. Wil remove AMD prefix and "BMEC)".
Thanks
Babu
> 
> >  /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:1 (EAX), word 12 */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX_VNNI		(12*32+ 4) /* AVX VNNI
> instructions */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > index c881bcafba7d..4555f9596ccf 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_dep cpuid_deps[] = {
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC,
> 	X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL,
> 	X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL,
> 	X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
> > +	{ X86_FEATURE_BMEC,			X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_AVX512_BF16,		X86_FEATURE_AVX512VL  },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_AVX512_FP16,		X86_FEATURE_AVX512BW  },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD,			X86_FEATURE_XSAVES
> },
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c index 5a5f17ed69a2..67c4d24e06ef
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK,    CPUID_EDX, 11, 0x80000007, 0 },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_MBA,		CPUID_EBX,  6, 0x80000008, 0 },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_SMBA,		CPUID_EBX,  2, 0x80000020, 0 },
> > +	{ X86_FEATURE_BMEC,		CPUID_EBX,  3, 0x80000020, 0 },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2,	CPUID_EAX,  0, 0x80000022, 0 },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2,	CPUID_EAX,  1, 0x80000022, 0 },
> >  	{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
> >
> >
> 
> Reinette

Download attachment "winmail.dat" of type "application/ms-tnef" (21536 bytes)