lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:02:33 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> To: Rahul Tanwar <rtanwar@...linear.com>, bigeasy@...utronix.de, robh@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-lgm-soc@...linear.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/of: Convert Intel's APIC bindings to YAML schema On 22/11/2022 08:39, Rahul Tanwar wrote: > Intel's APIC family of interrupt controllers support local APIC > (lapic) & I/O APIC (ioapic). Convert existing bindings for lapic > & ioapic from text to YAML schema. Separate lapic & ioapic schemas. > Addditionally, add description which was missing in text file and > add few more required standard properties which were also missing > in text file. > > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <rtanwar@...linear.com> > --- > .../intel,ce4100-ioapic.txt | 26 -------- > .../intel,ce4100-ioapic.yaml | 62 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../intel,ce4100-lapic.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/intel,ce4100-ioapic.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/intel,ce4100-ioapic.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/intel,ce4100-lapic.yaml > Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux kernel. You miss not only people but also lists, meaning this will not be automatically tested. So: No. Best regards, Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists