lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1609247.1669221883@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:44:43 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
        jlayton@...nel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] fscache,cachefiles: add prepare_ondemand_read() callback

Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> -/*
> - * Prepare a read operation, shortening it to a cached/uncached
> - * boundary as appropriate.
> - */
> -static enum netfs_io_source cachefiles_prepare_read(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq,
> -						      loff_t i_size)
> +static inline enum netfs_io_source
> +cachefiles_do_prepare_read(struct netfs_cache_resources *cres,
> +			   loff_t start, size_t *_len, loff_t i_size,
> +			   unsigned long *_flags)

That's not exactly what I meant, but I guess it would work as the compiler
would probably inline it into both callers.

> -		      __entry->netfs_inode, __entry->cache_inode)
> +		      __entry->cache_inode)

Can you not lose the netfs_inode number from the tracepoint, please?  Feel
free to display 0 there for your purposes.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ