[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1609247.1669221883@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:44:43 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
jlayton@...nel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] fscache,cachefiles: add prepare_ondemand_read() callback
Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> -/*
> - * Prepare a read operation, shortening it to a cached/uncached
> - * boundary as appropriate.
> - */
> -static enum netfs_io_source cachefiles_prepare_read(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq,
> - loff_t i_size)
> +static inline enum netfs_io_source
> +cachefiles_do_prepare_read(struct netfs_cache_resources *cres,
> + loff_t start, size_t *_len, loff_t i_size,
> + unsigned long *_flags)
That's not exactly what I meant, but I guess it would work as the compiler
would probably inline it into both callers.
> - __entry->netfs_inode, __entry->cache_inode)
> + __entry->cache_inode)
Can you not lose the netfs_inode number from the tracepoint, please? Feel
free to display 0 there for your purposes.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists