| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221123181838.1373440-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:18:38 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: remove lock_page_memcg() from rmap
rmap changes (mapping and unmapping) of a page currently take
lock_page_memcg() to serialize 1) update of the mapcount and the
cgroup mapped counter with 2) cgroup moving the page and updating the
old cgroup and the new cgroup counters based on page_mapped().
Before b2052564e66d ("mm: memcontrol: continue cache reclaim from
offlined groups"), we used to reassign all pages that could be found
on a cgroup's LRU list on deletion - something that rmap didn't
naturally serialize against. Since that commit, however, the only
pages that get moved are those mapped into page tables of a task
that's being migrated. In that case, the pte lock is always held (and
we know the page is mapped), which keeps rmap changes at bay already.
The additional lock_page_memcg() by rmap is redundant. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
mm/rmap.c | 12 ------------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 23750cec0036..52b86ca7a78e 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5676,7 +5676,10 @@ static struct page *mc_handle_file_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* @from: mem_cgroup which the page is moved from.
* @to: mem_cgroup which the page is moved to. @from != @to.
*
- * The caller must make sure the page is not on LRU (isolate_page() is useful.)
+ * This function acquires folio_lock() and folio_lock_memcg(). The
+ * caller must exclude all other possible ways of accessing
+ * page->memcg, such as LRU isolation (to lock out isolation) and
+ * having the page mapped and pte-locked (to lock out rmap).
*
* This function doesn't do "charge" to new cgroup and doesn't do "uncharge"
* from old cgroup.
@@ -5696,6 +5699,13 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page *page,
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio), folio);
VM_BUG_ON(compound && !folio_test_large(folio));
+ /*
+ * We're only moving pages mapped into the moving process's
+ * page tables. The caller's pte lock prevents rmap from
+ * removing the NR_x_MAPPED state while we transfer it.
+ */
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_mapped(folio));
+
/*
* Prevent mem_cgroup_migrate() from looking at
* page's memory cgroup of its source page while we change it.
@@ -5715,30 +5725,25 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page *page,
folio_memcg_lock(folio);
if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
- if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
- __mod_lruvec_state(from_vec, NR_ANON_MAPPED, -nr_pages);
- __mod_lruvec_state(to_vec, NR_ANON_MAPPED, nr_pages);
- if (folio_test_transhuge(folio)) {
- __mod_lruvec_state(from_vec, NR_ANON_THPS,
- -nr_pages);
- __mod_lruvec_state(to_vec, NR_ANON_THPS,
- nr_pages);
- }
+ __mod_lruvec_state(from_vec, NR_ANON_MAPPED, -nr_pages);
+ __mod_lruvec_state(to_vec, NR_ANON_MAPPED, nr_pages);
+
+ if (folio_test_transhuge(folio)) {
+ __mod_lruvec_state(from_vec, NR_ANON_THPS, -nr_pages);
+ __mod_lruvec_state(to_vec, NR_ANON_THPS, nr_pages);
}
} else {
__mod_lruvec_state(from_vec, NR_FILE_PAGES, -nr_pages);
__mod_lruvec_state(to_vec, NR_FILE_PAGES, nr_pages);
+ __mod_lruvec_state(from_vec, NR_FILE_MAPPED, -nr_pages);
+ __mod_lruvec_state(to_vec, NR_FILE_MAPPED, nr_pages);
+
if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
__mod_lruvec_state(from_vec, NR_SHMEM, -nr_pages);
__mod_lruvec_state(to_vec, NR_SHMEM, nr_pages);
}
- if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
- __mod_lruvec_state(from_vec, NR_FILE_MAPPED, -nr_pages);
- __mod_lruvec_state(to_vec, NR_FILE_MAPPED, nr_pages);
- }
-
if (folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 459dc1c44d8a..11a4894158db 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1222,9 +1222,6 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
bool compound = flags & RMAP_COMPOUND;
bool first = true;
- if (unlikely(PageKsm(page)))
- lock_page_memcg(page);
-
/* Is page being mapped by PTE? Is this its first map to be added? */
if (likely(!compound)) {
first = atomic_inc_and_test(&page->_mapcount);
@@ -1254,9 +1251,6 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
if (nr)
__mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_ANON_MAPPED, nr);
- if (unlikely(PageKsm(page)))
- unlock_page_memcg(page);
-
/* address might be in next vma when migration races vma_adjust */
else if (first)
__page_set_anon_rmap(page, vma, address,
@@ -1321,7 +1315,6 @@ void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *page,
bool first;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound && !PageTransHuge(page), page);
- lock_page_memcg(page);
/* Is page being mapped by PTE? Is this its first map to be added? */
if (likely(!compound)) {
@@ -1349,7 +1342,6 @@ void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *page,
NR_SHMEM_PMDMAPPED : NR_FILE_PMDMAPPED, nr_pmdmapped);
if (nr)
__mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_MAPPED, nr);
- unlock_page_memcg(page);
mlock_vma_page(page, vma, compound);
}
@@ -1378,8 +1370,6 @@ void page_remove_rmap(struct page *page,
return;
}
- lock_page_memcg(page);
-
/* Is page being unmapped by PTE? Is this its last map to be removed? */
if (likely(!compound)) {
last = atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount);
@@ -1427,8 +1417,6 @@ void page_remove_rmap(struct page *page,
* and remember that it's only reliable while mapped.
*/
- unlock_page_memcg(page);
-
munlock_vma_page(page, vma, compound);
}
--
2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists