[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y35mBVQgYgCvmZhz@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:27:17 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
Cc: josef@...icpanda.com, axboe@...nel.dk, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] blk-throttle: remove incorrect comment for
tg_last_low_overflow_time
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 02:03:57PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Function tg_last_low_overflow_time is called with intermediate node as
> following:
> throtl_hierarchy_can_downgrade
> throtl_tg_can_downgrade
> tg_last_low_overflow_time
>
> throtl_hierarchy_can_upgrade
> throtl_tg_can_upgrade
> tg_last_low_overflow_time
>
> throtl_hierarchy_can_downgrade/throtl_hierarchy_can_upgrade will traverse
> from leaf node to sub-root node and pass traversed intermediate node
> to tg_last_low_overflow_time.
>
> No such limit could be found from context and implementation of
> tg_last_low_overflow_time, so remove this limit in comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists