linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] blk-throttle: Use more siutable time_after check for update slice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y35mnXMNg8HeHXbb@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:29:49 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
Cc:     josef@...icpanda.com, axboe@...nel.dk, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] blk-throttle: Use more siutable time_after check
 for update slice_start

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 02:04:01PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Use more siutable time_after check for update slice_start

Why is it more suitable?

-- 
tejun