linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Don't dereference fwnode handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y35wQuIbiCxyaOyp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 21:10:58 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
        Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
        Daniel Scally <dan.scally@...asonboard.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Don't dereference fwnode handle

Dunno what happened to my previous reply to this. Okay, trying again...

+ Cc: Petr, Sergey

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly,
> which is a better coding practice.

It appears that this series depends on fd070e8ceb90 ("test_printf: Refactor
fwnode_pointer() to make it more readable") which is in PRINTK tree.

Sakari, Mauro, if you are okay to route this via that tree, can we get your
tags for that? Otherwise we need to postpone this till v6.2-rc1 (but I would
like to decrease the chances to appear a new user of the to be removed API).

Note, that Greg Acked v1 of the swnode patches (which are the same in v2).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko