[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221123204832.3e514378@jic23-huawei>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 20:48:32 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>
Cc: <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: iio: dac: ad5592r: add gpio_chip names
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:01:30 +0200
Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com> wrote:
> Add array of explicit gpio names for the `gpiochip` structure of
> ad5592r, mainly for debug purposes.
Can you give an example of when this is more useful than the offset?
(which I'm assuming is also available when debugging?)
Jonathan
>
> Since the gpios are configurable via the dts, generic names are
> used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> index 7a9b5fc1e579..076bc9ecfb49 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ static int ad5592r_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const char * const ad5592r_gpio_names[] = {
> + "GPIO0", "GPIO1", "GPIO2", "GPIO3", "GPIO4", "GPIO5", "GPIO6", "GPIO7",
> +};
> +
> static int ad5592r_gpio_init(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> {
> if (!st->gpio_map)
> @@ -140,6 +144,7 @@ static int ad5592r_gpio_init(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> st->gpiochip.set = ad5592r_gpio_set;
> st->gpiochip.request = ad5592r_gpio_request;
> st->gpiochip.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + st->gpiochip.names = ad5592r_gpio_names;
>
> mutex_init(&st->gpio_lock);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists