linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/18] platform/x86: int3472: fix object shared between several modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221123211938.56830-1-alobakin@mailbox.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:19:38 +0100
From:   Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...lbox.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...lbox.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Derek Chickles <dchickles@...vell.com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
        Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/18] platform/x86: int3472: fix object shared between several modules

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:34:11 +0100

> Hi,
> 
> On 11/21/22 10:06, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:12 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:

[...]

> > I think this patch series should be split
> > and sent to each sub-system instead of kbuild.
> 
> Yes definitely, the changes are big enough that not merging
> this through the subsystem trees is going to cause conflicts.

Makes sense! I'll collect the feedback here and then will be sending
stuff to the corresponding MLs with the reference to the original
commits which introduce Kbuild warnings.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans

[...]

Thanks!
Olek