[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d757b376-3e36-da95-b69c-21390a0c92f5@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:26:05 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<songmuchun@...edance.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
<jmattson@...gle.com>, <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
<sandipan.das@....com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<james.morse@....com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
<eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] Documentation/x86: Update resctrl.rst for new
features
Hi Babu,
On 11/4/2022 1:01 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
...
> @@ -464,6 +539,26 @@ Memory bandwidth domain is L3 cache.
>
> MB:<cache_id0>=bw_MBps0;<cache_id1>=bw_MBps1;...
>
> +Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation (SMBA)
> +---------------------------------------
> +AMD hardware support Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation (SMBA) feature.
How about
AMD hardware supports the Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation (SMBA) feature.
or
AMD hardware supports Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation (SMBA).
> +Currently, CXL.memory is the only supported "slow" memory device.
What does "Currently" mean here? If there is a plan for changes, could
that be shared? Otherwise maybe just remove it: "CXL.memory is the only
supported "slow" memory device."
> +With the support of SMBA, the hardware enables bandwidth allocation
> +on the slow memory devices. If there are multiple such devices in the
> +system, the throttling logic groups all the slow sources together
> +and applies the limit on them as a whole.
> +
> +The presence of SMBA (with CXL.memory) is independent of slow memory
> +devices presence. If there is no such devices on the system, then
Maybe "is no such device" or "are no such devices"?
> +setting the configuring SMBA will have no impact on the performance
"setting the configuring SMBA" is hard to parse. How about just
"configuring SMBA"?
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists