[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sfias2hd.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:26:25 +1100
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, william.kucharski@...cle.com,
ziy@...dia.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com,
zhenyzha@...hat.com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: Fix THP's mapcount on isolation
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com> writes:
> The issue is reported when removing memory through virtio_mem device.
> The transparent huge page, experienced copy-on-write fault, is wrongly
> regarded as pinned. The transparent huge page is escaped from being
> isolated in isolate_migratepages_block(). The transparent huge page
> can't be migrated and the corresponding memory block can't be put
> into offline state.
>
> Fix it by replacing page_mapcount() with total_mapcount(). With this,
> the transparent huge page can be isolated and migrated, and the memory
> block can be put into offline state.
>
> Fixes: 3917c80280c9 ("thp: change CoW semantics for anon-THP")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.8+
> Reported-by: Zhenyu Zhang <zhenyzha@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index c51f7f545afe..c408b5e04c1d 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
> * admittedly racy check.
> */
> mapping = page_mapping(page);
> - if (!mapping && page_count(page) > page_mapcount(page))
> + if (!mapping && page_count(page) > total_mapcount(page))
We have several versions of these checks for pinned pages open-coded
around the place. See for example migrate_vma_check_page() and
folio_expected_refs(). It looks like you could use a variant of
migrate_vma_check_page() which would also check non-anon pins, although
I don't know the compaction code well enough to know if that's useful.
Either way it would be nice if we had a common helper for these kind of
checks. Guess that would be harder to backport, and the change itself
looks ok. But why isn't the fixes tag 119d6d59dcc0 ("mm, compaction:
avoid isolating pinned pages")?
> goto isolate_fail;
>
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists