[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a67594cf-eb7f-873f-1c11-ccb4317b6bdf@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:15:25 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>, Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, "Nancy . Lin" <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/mediatek: Clean dangling pointer on bind error
path
Il 22/11/22 15:39, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> mtk_drm_bind() can fail, in which case drm_dev_put() is called,
> destroying the drm_device object. However a pointer to it was still
> being held in the private object, and that pointer would be passed along
> to DRM in mtk_drm_sys_prepare() if a suspend were triggered at that
> point, resulting in a panic. Clean the pointer when destroying the
> object in the error path to prevent this from happening.
>
> Fixes: 119f5173628a ("drm/mediatek: Add DRM Driver for Mediatek SoC MT8173.")
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Added Fixes tag
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> index 39a42dc8fb85..a21ff1b3258c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ static int mtk_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> err_deinit:
> mtk_drm_kms_deinit(drm);
> err_free:
> + private->drm = NULL;
Sorry for not noticing that in v1, but I've rechecked this function and, while this
commit does indeed actually solve the described issue, I think it's incomplete.
A few lines before, we have a loop that sets
private->all_drm_private[i]->drm = drm;
...so here you should do...
private->drm = NULL;
while (i--) /* a for loop will also do, your choice */
private->all_drm_private[i]->drm = NULL;
That makes sure that you cleanup *everything* :-)
Cheers,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists