[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec3754a6-3249-51ab-b659-fd795884e346@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:22:29 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, hch@....de,
josef@...icpanda.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] blk-iocost: fix sleeping in atomic context
warnning
Hi, Tejun
在 2022/11/23 8:42, Tejun Heo 写道:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:14:29PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> Then match_strdup() and kfree() in match_NUMBER() can be replaced with
>>>> get_buffer() and put_buffer().
>>>
>>> Sorry about the late reply. Yeah, something like this.
Thanks for the feedback. I'll remove patch 4 from this seies and send a
new patch separately soon.
Thanks,
Kuai
>>
>> Doesn't local_irq_disable() imply preemption disable as well?
>
> Right, I was thinking about spin_lock_irq() which doesn't imply disabling
> preemption in PREEMPT_RT. local_irq_disable() is actual irq disable even on
> RT. It should be fine on its own.
>
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists