[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r0xulzfd.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:48:06 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] random: introduce generic vDSO getrandom()
implementation
* Jason A. Donenfeld:
> static void *vgetrandom_alloc(size_t *num, size_t *size_per_each, unsigned int flags)
> {
> unsigned long ret = syscall(__NR_vgetrandom_alloc, num, size_per_each, flags);
> return ret > -4096UL ? NULL : (void *)ret;
> }
The traditional syscall function returns -1 on error and set errors, so
using unsing long and the 4096 is quite misleading.
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists