lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y33/VIsB5HGREY4i@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 12:09:08 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] x86: head_64.S spring cleaning

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:52:32AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The patch moves it from .data to .bss inadvertently, and I am not
> convinced Tom's analysis is entirely accurate: we may simply have
> garbage in image_offset if we access it before .bss gets cleared.

That should not be too hard to find out: add an endless loop in asm in
the guest right after the first image_offset access:

1:
	jmp 1b

and then dump its value.

Or Tom might have an even better solution.

But looking at the code, BSS clearing happens later, at .Lrelocated and
the EFI stub comes before it. AFAICT.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ