[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y34U+VQyRcUqfd0G@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 12:41:29 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 541/606] regulator: fan53555: Convert to i2c's
.probe_new()
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:01:40PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 07:41:12PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:44:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > + const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(client);
> > This function is only in -next so I'll skip all the patches that need
> > it.
> Just in case you missed that information from the cover letter:
> You can pull this function into your tree from Wolfram's immutable
> branch at
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/client_device_id_helper-immutable
No, the bit I found about it in the commit message (which I had to go
looking for...) was a link to some discussion about how it'd be a good
idea to apply it. I suspect things might go more smoothly if things
were resent as per-subsystem serieses TBH.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists