linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/149] 5.10.156-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvgaNKbr_EhWsh9hjnzCeVXGJoXX4to72ytdvZi8W0svA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 21:17:36 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/149] 5.10.156-rc1 review

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:30, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 14:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.156 release.
> > There are 149 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:45:20 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.156-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> With stable rc 5.10.156-rc1 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B failed to boot due to
> following warnings / errors [1]. The NFS mount failed and failed to boot.
>
> I have to bisect this problem.

Daniel bisected this reported problem and found the first bad commit,

YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
    net: broadcom: Fix BCMGENET Kconfig


> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
>
> [    0.000000] Linux version 5.10.156-rc1 (tuxmake@...make)
> (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 11.3.0-6) 11.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils
> for Debian) 2.39) #1 SMP PREEMPT @1669194931
> [    0.000000] Machine model: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B
> ---
> [    3.253965] mmc0: new high speed SDIO card at address 0001
> [    7.229502] bcmgenet fd580000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up -
> 1Gbps/Full - flow control off
> [    7.237710] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> [    7.253259] Sending DHCP requests ......
> [   81.086546] DHCP/BOOTP: Reply not for us on eth0, op[2] xid[42e6766b]
> [   89.106504] DHCP/BOOTP: Reply not for us on eth0, op[2] xid[42e6766b]
> [   98.657252]  timed out!
> [   98.683997] bcmgenet fd580000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down
> [   98.691276] IP-Config: Retrying forever (NFS root)...
> [   98.698404] bcmgenet fd580000.ethernet: configuring instance for
> external RGMII (RX delay)
> [   98.707190] bcmgenet fd580000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down
> [  102.813504] bcmgenet fd580000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up -
> 1Gbps/Full - flow control off
> [  102.821680] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> [  102.841257] Sending DHCP requests ....
> [  119.840915] DHCP/BOOTP: Reply not for us on eth0, op[2] xid[34e6766b]
> [  127.860148] DHCP/BOOTP: Reply not for us on eth0, op[2] xid[34e6766b]
> [  132.513252] .. timed out!
>
> [1] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/5880584#L392
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org