lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63c416b9-b5cc-7c7d-1dad-ef00d0512d93@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:38:21 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Sheng Yong <shengyong@...o.com>
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] f2fs: fix to enable compress for newly created file if
 extension matches

On 2022/11/24 5:29, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> +	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
>>> +		goto inherit_comp;
>>
>> Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
>>
>> - Priority in between FS_COMPR_FL, FS_NOCOMP_FS, extensions:
>>
>>    * compress_extension=so; nocompress_extension=zip; chattr +c dir; touch
>>      dir/foo.so; touch dir/bar.zip; touch dir/baz.txt; then foo.so and baz.txt
>>      should be compresse, bar.zip should be non-compressed. chattr +c dir/bar.zip
>>      can enable compress on bar.zip.
>>
>> It looks nocompress_extension has higher priority than flag inheriting?
> 
> I think so.

Hi Sheng, Jaegeuk,

Yup, I guess I misunderstand the code. :)

Thanks,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ