[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f158bc8a-8351-49a7-3246-91b8a1413ccd@9elements.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:04:46 +0530
From: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
broonie@...nel.org,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (pmbus/core): Implement regulator get_status
Hi Guenter,
On 23-11-2022 12:18 am, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:03:02AM +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>> From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
>>
>> Add get_status for pmbus_regulator_ops.
>> ---
>> Changes:
>> - use lock throughout the function
>> - Avoid line continuation upto 100 column
>> - Optimize use of & and | operator
>> - Check for VOUT, IOUT, TEMPERATURE bit in status word before checking
>> respective status register for fault.
>> - Report regulator current status.
>> - Utilize get_error_flag to check for regulator errors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@...ements.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>
>>
>> base-commit: 27fea302952d8c90cafbdbee96bafeca03544401
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> index 7ec04934747e..5df2aee549e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> @@ -2851,6 +2851,46 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_get_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> + struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> + int status, ret;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> + status = pmbus_get_status(client, page, PMBUS_STATUS_WORD);
>> + if (status < 0) {
>> + ret = status;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (status & PB_STATUS_OFF) {
>> + ret = REGULATOR_STATUS_OFF;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* If regulator is ON & reports power good then return ON */
>> + if (!(status & PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N)) {
>> + ret = REGULATOR_STATUS_ON;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (rdev->desc->ops->get_error_flags)
>> + ret = rdev->desc->ops->get_error_flags(rdev, &status);
>> +
>
> What about checking ret ?
Fixed in next revision.
>
>> + if (status & (REGULATOR_ERROR_UNDER_VOLTAGE | REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT |
>> + REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT | REGULATOR_ERROR_FAIL | REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP))
>> + ret = REGULATOR_STATUS_ERROR;
>> + else
>> + ret = REGULATOR_STATUS_UNDEFINED;
>
> This part has to be inside "if (rdev->desc->ops->get_error_flags)"
> or status will still contain the status word.
Yes. fixed in next version.
>
> Guenter
>
>> +
>> +unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int pmbus_regulator_get_low_margin(struct i2c_client *client, int page)
>> {
>> struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> @@ -2991,6 +3031,7 @@ const struct regulator_ops pmbus_regulator_ops = {
>> .disable = pmbus_regulator_disable,
>> .is_enabled = pmbus_regulator_is_enabled,
>> .get_error_flags = pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags,
>> + .get_status = pmbus_regulator_get_status,
>> .get_voltage = pmbus_regulator_get_voltage,
>> .set_voltage = pmbus_regulator_set_voltage,
>> .list_voltage = pmbus_regulator_list_voltage,
Regards,
Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists