linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] soundwire: Provide build stubs for common functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221124092231.GD105268@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:22:31 +0000
From:   Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC:     <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>, <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] soundwire: Provide build stubs for common
 functions

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:21:32AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 21-11-22, 14:14, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > Provide stub functions when CONFIG_SOUNDWIRE is not set for functions
> > that are quite likely to be used from common code on devices supporting
> > multiple control buses.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
> > ---
> > +static inline int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> > +				       struct sdw_stream_config *stream_config,
> > +				       struct sdw_port_config *port_config,
> > +				       unsigned int num_ports,
> > +				       struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
> > +{
> > +	return 0;
> 
> Should this and other here not return error...? Indicating sdw is not
> available..? Silently ignoring may not be very helpful in debugging
> 

Yeah I was a little unsure which way to go on that, in the end I
opted for returning zero as it was more likely code would get
optimised out. But I am happy to switch to returning an error, it
would as you say making debugging misconfigurations easier.
-ENOSYS seems kinda reasonable I think.

Thanks,
Charles