lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63972059-1c23-ceb9-841c-1cfee29a1c77@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:43:26 +0100
From:   Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: A collection of typo and
 documentation fixes

Am 24.11.22 um 10:05 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:03:09AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 23.11.22 um 20:35 schrieb T.J. Mercier:
>>> I've been collecting these typo fixes for a while and it feels like
>>> time to send them in.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>
>> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> Will you also push this? I think tj doesn't have commit rights yet, and I
> somehow can't see the patch locally (I guess it's stuck in moderation).

I was just about to complain that this doesn't apply cleanly to 
drm-misc-next.

Trivial problem, one of the typos was just removed by Dimitry a few 
weeks ago.

I've fixed that up locally and pushed the result, but nevertheless 
please make sure that DMA-buf patches are based on the drm branches.

Thanks,
Christian.

> -Daniel
>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>>    include/linux/dma-buf.h   |  6 +++---
>>>    2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> index dd0f83ee505b..614ccd208af4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_unmap_attachment, DMA_BUF);
>>>     *
>>>     * @dmabuf:	[in]	buffer which is moving
>>>     *
>>> - * Informs all attachmenst that they need to destroy and recreated all their
>>> + * Informs all attachments that they need to destroy and recreate all their
>>>     * mappings.
>>>     */
>>>    void dma_buf_move_notify(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>>> @@ -1159,11 +1159,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify, DMA_BUF);
>>>    /**
>>>     * DOC: cpu access
>>>     *
>>> - * There are mutliple reasons for supporting CPU access to a dma buffer object:
>>> + * There are multiple reasons for supporting CPU access to a dma buffer object:
>>>     *
>>>     * - Fallback operations in the kernel, for example when a device is connected
>>>     *   over USB and the kernel needs to shuffle the data around first before
>>> - *   sending it away. Cache coherency is handled by braketing any transactions
>>> + *   sending it away. Cache coherency is handled by bracketing any transactions
>>>     *   with calls to dma_buf_begin_cpu_access() and dma_buf_end_cpu_access()
>>>     *   access.
>>>     *
>>> @@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify, DMA_BUF);
>>>     *   replace ION buffers mmap support was needed.
>>>     *
>>>     *   There is no special interfaces, userspace simply calls mmap on the dma-buf
>>> - *   fd. But like for CPU access there's a need to braket the actual access,
>>> + *   fd. But like for CPU access there's a need to bracket the actual access,
>>>     *   which is handled by the ioctl (DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC). Note that
>>>     *   DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC can fail with -EAGAIN or -EINTR, in which case it must
>>>     *   be restarted.
>>> @@ -1264,10 +1264,10 @@ static int __dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>>>     * preparations. Coherency is only guaranteed in the specified range for the
>>>     * specified access direction.
>>>     * @dmabuf:	[in]	buffer to prepare cpu access for.
>>> - * @direction:	[in]	length of range for cpu access.
>>> + * @direction:	[in]	direction of access.
>>>     *
>>>     * After the cpu access is complete the caller should call
>>> - * dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). Only when cpu access is braketed by both calls is
>>> + * dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). Only when cpu access is bracketed by both calls is
>>>     * it guaranteed to be coherent with other DMA access.
>>>     *
>>>     * This function will also wait for any DMA transactions tracked through
>>> @@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_begin_cpu_access, DMA_BUF);
>>>     * actions. Coherency is only guaranteed in the specified range for the
>>>     * specified access direction.
>>>     * @dmabuf:	[in]	buffer to complete cpu access for.
>>> - * @direction:	[in]	length of range for cpu access.
>>> + * @direction:	[in]	direction of access.
>>>     *
>>>     * This terminates CPU access started with dma_buf_begin_cpu_access().
>>>     *
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>>> index 71731796c8c3..1d61a4f6db35 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>>> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
>>>    	 * @lock:
>>>    	 *
>>>    	 * Used internally to serialize list manipulation, attach/detach and
>>> -	 * vmap/unmap. Note that in many cases this is superseeded by
>>> +	 * vmap/unmap. Note that in many cases this is superseded by
>>>    	 * dma_resv_lock() on @resv.
>>>    	 */
>>>    	struct mutex lock;
>>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
>>>    	 */
>>>    	const char *name;
>>> -	/** @name_lock: Spinlock to protect name acces for read access. */
>>> +	/** @name_lock: Spinlock to protect name access for read access. */
>>>    	spinlock_t name_lock;
>>>    	/**
>>> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
>>>    	 *   anything the userspace API considers write access.
>>>    	 *
>>>    	 * - Drivers may just always add a write fence, since that only
>>> -	 *   causes unecessarily synchronization, but no correctness issues.
>>> +	 *   causes unnecessary synchronization, but no correctness issues.
>>>    	 *
>>>    	 * - Some drivers only expose a synchronous userspace API with no
>>>    	 *   pipelining across drivers. These do not set any fences for their

Powered by blists - more mailing lists