linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add zombie

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b54cd0a4-7ee8-e8c0-ceda-18b29588d535@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:27:28 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     楊宗翰 <ecs.taipeikernel@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bob Moragues <moragues@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, Harvey <hunge@...gle.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Gavin.Lee@....com.tw,
        Darren.Chen@....com.tw, Abner.Yen@....com.tw, Vicy.Lee@....com.tw,
        Jason.Huang@....com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add zombie

On 24/11/2022 12:20, 楊宗翰 wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof, Matthias,
> 
> How to use "get_maintainers.pl"?
> 
> I find this script in path "<MyCodebase>/kernel/v5.15/script", and output

This looks like v5.15 kernel which is heavily outdated. Please never
work on such kernels when interacting with upstream. The rule is you
work on either last mainline kernel (v6.1-rc6), maintainers for-next
branch (you should know who is the maintainer of subsystem you submit
to, get_maintainers.pl gives this information) or on moderately recent
linux-next. For bigger patchsets there might be exceptions for these
rules, but it's not the case here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof