lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c477253-eb89-260f-adde-5850d749b000@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 19:47:15 +0800
From:   Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:     <josef@...icpanda.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] blk-throttle: Limit whole system if root group is
 configured when on the default hierarchy



on 11/24/2022 1:11 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 02:03:51PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> Quoted from comment in throtl_pd_init: "If on the default hierarchy, we
>> switch to properly hierarchical behavior where limits on a given
>> throtl_grp are applied to the whole subtree rather than just the group
>> itself. e.g. If 16M read_bps limit is set on the root group, the whole
>> system can' exceed 16M for the device."
> 
> On the default hierarchy (cgroup2), the throttle interface files don't exist
> in the root cgroup. In general, cgroup doesn't wanna be in the business of
> restricting resources at the system level.
Hi, Tejun. Thanks for review. If restricting is not needed anymore, the stale
comment "e.g. If 16M read_bps limit is set on the root group, the whole system
can' exceed 16M for the device." may better be remove. I will remove this
in next version.


-- 
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ