linux-kernel - Re: [patch V2 27/33] genirq/msi: Provide constants for PCI/IMS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <875yf4cwht.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:28:30 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
        Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 27/33] genirq/msi: Provide constants for PCI/IMS support

On Thu, Nov 24 2022 at 09:09, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:10:05AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24 2022 at 03:01, Kevin Tian wrote:
>> > SECONDARY or be explicit IMS? Are we envisioning non-IMS usages to
>> > occupy this slot in the future?
>> 
>> I'm not really decided on that. Whatever the name or use-case for a
>> secondary domain is. Not, that this is not restricted to PCI.
>
> This is hierarchical right? So if a pci_device spawns an
> auxiliary_device, its driver could stick a msi domain on the
> MSI_DEFAULT_DOMAIN of the aux device as a child of the PCI device's
> domain?

A child of the PCI devices parent domain. The per device domains are
endpoint domains. They cannot serve as parent domains themself right
now.

If there is a real reason and use case which requires that, it can be
made work with trivial tweaks.

Thanks,

        tglx