[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y393OvlAa+h8Dyek@wendy>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 13:52:58 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
CC: <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: riscv: fix single letter canonical order
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 02:42:20PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2022, 14:04:41 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> > I used the wikipedia table for ordering extensions when updating the
> > pattern here in foo.
>
> ^ foo? :-)
God damn it! I wrote foo, left nvim to check what the fixes tag would
be, came back and added it below but did not update this part of the
commit log...
> > Unfortunately that table did not match canonical order, as defined by
> > the RISC-V ISA Manual, which defines extension ordering in (what is
> > currently) Table 41, "Standard ISA extension names". Fix things up by
> > re-sorting v (vector) and adding p (packed-simd) & j (dynamic
> > languages). The e (reduced integer) and g (general) extensions are still
> > intentionally left out.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/tag/riscv-unpriv-pdf-from-asciidoc-15112022 # Chapter 29.5
> > Fixes: 299824e68bd0 ("dt-bindings: riscv: add new riscv,isa strings for emulators")
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> So I have compared the new pattern to the isa manual,
> and it looks like the order checks out, so
>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists