[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4FTQenbPLXy/9Bz@spud>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 23:44:01 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clocksource: timer-riscv: Set
CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP based on DT
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 01:13:04PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 04:51:05PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > We should set CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP for a clock_event_device only
> > when riscv,timer-cant-wake-up DT property is present in the RISC-V
> > timer DT node.
> >
> > This way CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP feature is set for clock_event_device
> > based on RISC-V platform capabilities rather than having it set for
> > all RISC-V platforms.
>
> I need to go do some testing on what setting the C3STOP flag does on
> platforms other than PolarFire SoC. I'm not sure that we should be
> enabling this flag *at all* until we know that it does not break on
> other platforms too.
I tried my fu540 & fu740 - both of those seem to exhibit broken timer
behaviour with C3STOP set. Ethernet doesn't work upstream on the
VisionFive, so I didn't go through the hassle of testing that - but I
would imagine it is the same as the fu740. Whenever I get a VisionFive 2
I'll give that a try too.
I did try the D1 (thanks for fielding my dumb questions Samuel) but I
was not able to get the thing to boot if I disabled the sunxi timer :/
Ethernet would not come up in U-Boot, clearly I did something not
right..
Obviously we need to fix things & get it backported etc, so taking a
pragmatic approach: I think that it is better to merge this stuff even
though it there's a pretty good chance I think that it'll break the
SBI timer on a D1, since it is not intended that it will be used.
It does make me worried about some of the other platforms though, like
that Bouffalolabs SoC that Jisheng sent in a DT for. It's also using
thead stuff so I wonder if it needs C3STOP too. I've added Jisheng to
CC :)
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> > index a0d66fabf073..0c8bdd168a45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> > #include <asm/timex.h>
> >
> > static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(riscv_sstc_available);
> > +static bool riscv_timer_cant_wake_cpu;
> >
> > static int riscv_clock_next_event(unsigned long delta,
> > struct clock_event_device *ce)
> > @@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ static int riscv_timer_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> >
> > ce->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
> > ce->irq = riscv_clock_event_irq;
> > + if (riscv_timer_cant_wake_cpu)
> > + ce->features |= CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP;
> > clockevents_config_and_register(ce, riscv_timebase, 100, 0x7fffffff);
> >
> > enable_percpu_irq(riscv_clock_event_irq,
> > @@ -139,6 +142,13 @@ static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
> > if (cpuid != smp_processor_id())
> > return 0;
> >
> > + child = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "riscv,timer");
> > + if (child) {
> > + riscv_timer_cant_wake_cpu = of_property_read_bool(child,
> > + "riscv,timer-cant-wake-cpu");
> > + of_node_put(child);
> > + }
> > +
> > domain = NULL;
> > child = of_get_compatible_child(n, "riscv,cpu-intc");
> > if (!child) {
Anyway, the mechanics of the change here look good to me. The re-use of
child is understandable but a little odd though, since riscv,timer /is
not/ actually a child. That's relatively minor thing to change though.
I'm still not happy about turning on C3STOP when we have not figured out
why it's breaking timer behaviour, but I think that's the lessor of two
evils. Somewhat reluctantly:
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
I'll try to spend some time looking into why it's broken.
Thanks,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists