linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Print interrupt index in addition to the mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb4347b0-b885-1a00-6ab1-03566191e1ec@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 22:21:22 -0800
From:   Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        <phone-devel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        "Sean Paul" <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Polimera <quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Print interrupt index in addition to the
 mask



On 11/21/2022 2:24 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> The mask only describes the `irq_idx % 32` part, making it generally
> impossible to deduce what interrupt is being enabled/disabled.  Since
> `debug/core_irq` in debugfs (and other prints) also include the full
> `DPU_IRQ_IDX()` value, print the same full value here for easier
> correlation instead of only adding the `irq_idx / 32` part.
> 
> Furthermore, make the dbgstr messages more consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c | 12 ++++++------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
> index cf1b6d84c18a..64589a9c2c51 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
> @@ -252,9 +252,9 @@ static int dpu_hw_intr_enable_irq_locked(struct dpu_hw_intr *intr, int irq_idx)
>   
>   	cache_irq_mask = intr->cache_irq_mask[reg_idx];
>   	if (cache_irq_mask & DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx)) {
> -		dbgstr = "DPU IRQ already set:";
> +		dbgstr = "already ";
>   	} else {
> -		dbgstr = "DPU IRQ enabled:";
> +		dbgstr = "";
>   
>   		cache_irq_mask |= DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx);
>   		/* Cleaning any pending interrupt */
> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int dpu_hw_intr_enable_irq_locked(struct dpu_hw_intr *intr, int irq_idx)
>   		intr->cache_irq_mask[reg_idx] = cache_irq_mask;
>   	}
>   
> -	pr_debug("%s MASK:0x%.8lx, CACHE-MASK:0x%.8x\n", dbgstr,
> +	pr_debug("DPU IRQ %d %senabled: MASK:0x%.8lx, CACHE-MASK:0x%.8x\n", irq_idx, dbgstr,
>   			DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx), cache_irq_mask);
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -301,9 +301,9 @@ static int dpu_hw_intr_disable_irq_locked(struct dpu_hw_intr *intr, int irq_idx)
>   
>   	cache_irq_mask = intr->cache_irq_mask[reg_idx];
>   	if ((cache_irq_mask & DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx)) == 0) {
> -		dbgstr = "DPU IRQ is already cleared:";
> +		dbgstr = "already ";
>   	} else {
> -		dbgstr = "DPU IRQ mask disable:";
> +		dbgstr = "";
>   
>   		cache_irq_mask &= ~DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx);
>   		/* Disable interrupts based on the new mask */
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int dpu_hw_intr_disable_irq_locked(struct dpu_hw_intr *intr, int irq_idx)
>   		intr->cache_irq_mask[reg_idx] = cache_irq_mask;
>   	}
>   
> -	pr_debug("%s MASK:0x%.8lx, CACHE-MASK:0x%.8x\n", dbgstr,
> +	pr_debug("DPU IRQ %d %sdisabled: MASK:0x%.8lx, CACHE-MASK:0x%.8x\n", irq_idx, dbgstr,
>   			DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx), cache_irq_mask);
>   
>   	return 0;