[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e22e325e-bf49-c1de-4356-962ece1287fe@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 16:18:51 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: ye.xingchen@....com.cn, andersson@...nel.org
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock: Use device_match_of_node()
On 11/25/2022 3:44 PM, ye.xingchen@....com.cn wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Replace the open-code with device_match_of_node().
>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
> index fd5f5c5a5244..22b8f2a70b3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ int of_hwspin_lock_get_id(struct device_node *np, int index)
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (hwlock->bank->dev->of_node == args.np) {
> + if (device_match_of_node(hwlock->bank->dev, args.np)) {
> ret = 0;
> break;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists