linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv/ftrace: add DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2022 01:53:19 +0000
From:   Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc:     paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, peterz@...radead.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
        bp@...e.de, jpoimboe@...nel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv/ftrace: add DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS support

Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> 于2022年11月24日周四 15:31写道：
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:27 AM Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> 于2022年11月23日周三 23:02写道：
> > >
> > > Cool job, thx.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:20 PM Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> This patch adds DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS support for RISC-V.
> > >>
> > >> select the DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS to provide the
> > >> register_ftrace_direct[_multi] interfaces allowing users to register
> > >> the customed trampoline (direct_caller) as the mcount for one or
> > >> more target functions. And modify_ftrace_direct[_multi] are also
> > >> provided for modifying direct_caller.
> > >>
> > >> To make the direct_caller and the other ftrace hooks (eg. function/fgraph
> > >> tracer, k[ret]probes) co-exist, a temporary register is nominated to
> > >> store the address of direct_caller in ftrace_regs_caller. After the
> > >> setting of the address direct_caller by direct_ops->func and the
> > >> RESTORE_REGS in ftrace_regs_caller, direct_caller will be jumped to
> > >> by the `jr` inst.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  arch/riscv/Kconfig              | 1 +
> > >>  arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h | 6 ++++++
> > >>  arch/riscv/kernel/mcount-dyn.S  | 4 ++++
> > >>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > >> index 39ec8d628cf6..d083ec08d0b6 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > >> @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ config ARCH_RV64I
> > >>         select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if CC_HAS_INT128
> > >>         select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL && MMU && $(cc-option,-fpatchable-function-entry=8)
> > >>         select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS if HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> > >> +       select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
> > >>         select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD if !XIP_KERNEL
> > >>         select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > >>         select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if !XIP_KERNEL && !PREEMPTION
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > >> index 01bebb28eabe..be4d57566139 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > >> @@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ struct ftrace_regs;
> > >>  void ftrace_graph_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > >>                        struct ftrace_ops *op, struct ftrace_regs *fregs);
> > >>  #define ftrace_graph_func ftrace_graph_func
> > >> +
> > >> +static inline void arch_ftrace_set_direct_caller(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
> > >> +{
> > >> +               regs->t1 = addr;
> > >
> > > How about regs->t0 = addr; ?
> > > And delete all mcount-dyn.S modification.
> > >
> > The direct_caller has the same program layout as the ftrace_caller, which means
> > the reg t0 will never be changed when direct_caller returns.
> >
> > If regs->t0 changes here and ftrace_regs_caller executes `jr t0`,
> > direct_caller will enter the dead loop.
> >
> > Actually the reg t0 always saves the address of function entry with 8B
> > offset, it should only
> > changed by the IPMODIFY ops instead of the direct_ops.
> How about:
> static inline void arch_ftrace_set_direct_caller(struct pt_regs *regs,
> unsigned long addr)
> {
>                regs->t1 = regs->t0;
>                regs->t0 = addr;
>
> direct_caller:
> add sp,sp,-?
> sd t1,?(sp)
direct_caller also serves as the first trampoline as ftrace_caller, like this:
```
func -- direct_caller
        -- ftrace_[regs]_caller
```
So the t1 in this line has to be t0 to save the PC.
> sd ra,?(sp)
> call foo
> ld t1,?(sp)
And this line.
> ld ra,?(sp)
> add sp,sp,?
> jr t1 // <- back to function entry
>
> And delete all mcount-dyn.S modification.
>
> > >>
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >>  #endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS */
> > >>
> > >>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/mcount-dyn.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/mcount-dyn.S
> > >> index 466c6ef217b1..b89c85a58569 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/mcount-dyn.S
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/mcount-dyn.S
> > >> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ ENDPROC(ftrace_caller)
> > >>  #else /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS */
> > >>  ENTRY(ftrace_regs_caller)
> > >>         SAVE_ABI_REGS 1
> > >> +       REG_S   x0, PT_T1(sp)
> > >>         PREPARE_ARGS
> > >>
> > >>  ftrace_regs_call:
> > >> @@ -241,7 +242,10 @@ ftrace_regs_call:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>         RESTORE_ABI_REGS 1
> > >> +       bnez    t1,.Ldirect
> > >>         jr t0
> > >> +.Ldirect:
> > >> +       jr t1
> > >>  ENDPROC(ftrace_regs_caller)
> > >>
> > >>  ENTRY(ftrace_caller)
> > >> --
> > >> 2.20.1
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards
> > >  Guo Ren
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>  Guo Ren
Thanks,
Song