lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <887a77acc9bf96f7c7bea519ab7ebdd27fb67985.camel@intel.com> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:13:48 +0000 From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com> To: "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com> CC: "sean.j.christopherson@...el.com" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "Shahar, Sagi" <sagis@...gle.com>, "isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>, "Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>, "dmatlack@...gle.com" <dmatlack@...gle.com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 035/108] KVM: x86/mmu: Track shadow MMIO value on a per-VM basis On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 10:10 +0800, Yan Zhao wrote: > Also make enable_mmio_caching to be a per-VM value? > As if the shadow_mmio_value is 0, mmio_caching needs to be disabled. If I recall correctly, Sean said we can disable TDX guests if mmio_caching is disabled (we also will need to change to allow enable_mmio_caching to still be true when mmio_value is 0). SEV_ES has similar logic: void __init sev_hardware_setup(void) { ... /* * SEV-ES requires MMIO caching as KVM doesn't have access to the guest * instruction stream, i.e. can't emulate in response to a #NPF and * instead relies on #NPF(RSVD) being reflected into the guest as #VC * (the guest can then do a #VMGEXIT to request MMIO emulation). */ if (!enable_mmio_caching) goto out;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists