linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: wm_adsp: Report when a control write changes the value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <166938640633.506633.103320860626722762.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:26:46 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: wm_adsp: Report when a control write changes the value

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:51:38 +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> Writing a firmware control should be returning 1 if the control value
> changed, so these two patches add that.
> 
> Though this is an ALSA requirement it is also useful for non-ALSA clients
> of cs_dsp to know if the control value changed, so the main handling is
> implemented in cs_dsp. TLV controls are specifically an ALSA thing so they
> are handled specially in wm_adsp.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] firmware: cs_dsp: cs_dsp_coeff_write_ctrl() should report changed
      commit: c56f4b2442d33bd94c418697f753271099384bee
[2/2] ASoC: wm_adsp: Return whether changed when writing controls
      commit: 7406bdbc4fb8b99cf0150cb2056a585c95ceafe7

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark