[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfd956d5-d62d-52ac-c485-afc71c441df5@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 15:47:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@...sung.com>,
Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add
dedicated SYSREG compatibles to Exynos5433
On 25/11/2022 15:22, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 05:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Exynos5433 has several different SYSREGs, so use dedicated compatibles
>> for them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Cc: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
>> ---
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Just curious: what is the rationale for adding those more specific
> sysregs? AFAIR, e.g. in Exynos850, different SysReg instances have
> pretty much the same register layout.
>
On Exynos5433 all these blocks have different registers. Are you saying
that Exynos850 has four (or more) sysregs which are exactly the same?
Same registers? Why would they duplicate it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists