lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfd956d5-d62d-52ac-c485-afc71c441df5@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2022 15:47:19 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@...sung.com>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add
 dedicated SYSREG compatibles to Exynos5433

On 25/11/2022 15:22, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 05:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Exynos5433 has several different SYSREGs, so use dedicated compatibles
>> for them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Cc: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
>> ---
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Just curious: what is the rationale for adding those more specific
> sysregs? AFAIR, e.g. in Exynos850, different SysReg instances have
> pretty much the same register layout.
> 

On Exynos5433 all these blocks have different registers. Are you saying
that Exynos850 has four (or more) sysregs which are exactly the same?
Same registers? Why would they duplicate it?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ