linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: cdev: fix NULL-pointer dereferences

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2022 00:24:47 +0800
From:   Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: cdev: fix NULL-pointer dereferences

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 04:32:57PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> 
> There are several places where we can crash the kernel by requesting
> lines, unbinding the GPIO device, then calling any of the system calls
> relevant to the GPIO character device's annonymous file descriptors:
> ioctl(), read(), poll().
> 
> While I observed it with the GPIO simulator, it will also happen for any
> of the GPIO devices that can be hot-unplugged - for instance any HID GPIO
> expander (e.g. CP2112).
> 
> This affects both v1 and v2 uAPI.
> 
> Fix this by simply checking if the GPIO chip pointer is not NULL.
> 

Fixes: ??

And split for v1 and v2 as the Fixes for those will differ?

> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> index 0cb6b468f364..d5632742942a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,9 @@ static long linehandle_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (!lh->gdev->chip)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +

Is there anything to prevent the chip being removed by another thread
between this check and subsequent usage?

Cheers,
Kent.

>  	switch (cmd) {
>  	case GPIOHANDLE_GET_LINE_VALUES_IOCTL:
>  		/* NOTE: It's okay to read values of output lines */
> @@ -1384,6 +1387,9 @@ static long linereq_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  	struct linereq *lr = file->private_data;
>  	void __user *ip = (void __user *)arg;
>  
> +	if (!lr->gdev->chip)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	switch (cmd) {
>  	case GPIO_V2_LINE_GET_VALUES_IOCTL:
>  		return linereq_get_values(lr, ip);
> @@ -1716,6 +1722,9 @@ static __poll_t lineevent_poll(struct file *file,
>  	struct lineevent_state *le = file->private_data;
>  	__poll_t events = 0;
>  
> +	if (!le->gdev->chip)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	poll_wait(file, &le->wait, wait);
>  
>  	if (!kfifo_is_empty_spinlocked_noirqsave(&le->events, &le->wait.lock))
> @@ -1740,6 +1749,9 @@ static ssize_t lineevent_read(struct file *file,
>  	ssize_t ge_size;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (!le->gdev->chip)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * When compatible system call is being used the struct gpioevent_data,
>  	 * in case of at least ia32, has different size due to the alignment
> @@ -1821,6 +1833,9 @@ static long lineevent_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  	void __user *ip = (void __user *)arg;
>  	struct gpiohandle_data ghd;
>  
> +	if (!le->gdev->chip)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * We can get the value for an event line but not set it,
>  	 * because it is input by definition.
> -- 
> 2.37.2
>