lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1fb146231e1810b4c9923f384afa166e07e7f253.camel@perches.com> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 12:18:39 -0800 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] printk: introduce new macros pr_<level>_cont() On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 20:09 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > These macros emit continuation messages with explicit levels. > In case the continuation is logged separately from the original message > it will retain its level instead of falling back to KERN_DEFAULT. > > This remedies the issue that logs filtered by level contain stray > continuation messages without context. > > Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net> > --- > include/linux/printk.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h > index 8c81806c2e99..8f564c38f121 100644 > --- a/include/linux/printk.h > +++ b/include/linux/printk.h > @@ -537,6 +537,8 @@ struct pi_entry { > * This macro expands to a printk with KERN_CONT loglevel. It should only be > * used when continuing a log message with no newline ('\n') enclosed. Otherwise > * it defaults back to KERN_DEFAULT loglevel. > + * > + * Use the dedicated pr_<level>_cont() macros instead. > */ > #define pr_cont(fmt, ...) \ > printk(KERN_CONT fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > @@ -701,6 +703,27 @@ do { \ > no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > #endif > > +/* > + * Print a continuation message with level. In case the continuation is split > + * from the main message it preserves the level. > + */ > + > +#define pr_emerg_cont(fmt, ...) \ > + printk(KERN_EMERG KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) Aren't this rather backwards? KERN_CONT KERN_<LEVEL> seems to make more sense to me. > +#define pr_alert_cont(fmt, ...) \ > + printk(KERN_ALERT KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#define pr_crit_cont(fmt, ...) \ > + printk(KERN_CRIT KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#define pr_err_cont(fmt, ...) \ > + printk(KERN_ERR KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#define pr_warn_cont(fmt, ...) \ > + printk(KERN_WARN KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#define pr_notice_cont(fmt, ...) \ > + printk(KERN_NOTICE KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#define pr_info_cont(fmt, ...) \ > + printk(KERN_INFO KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > +/* no pr_debug_ratelimited, it doesn't make sense with CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG. */ > + > extern const struct file_operations kmsg_fops; > > enum {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists