lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cefdae2e-67e3-b4b4-f569-31db960e991f@huaweicloud.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 16:54:46 +0800 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, ming.lei@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] scsi: core: remove unsed 'restarts' from scsi_device Hi, 在 2022/11/18 19:30, Yu Kuai 写道: > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com> > > During code review, I found that 'restarts' is not useful anymore after > the following commits: > > 1) commit ab3cee3762e5 ("blk-mq: In blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list() "no budget" > is a reason to kick") > 2) commit d3b38596875d ("blk-mq: run queue no matter whether the request > is the last request") > 3) commit 673235f91531 ("scsi: core: Fix race between handling STS_RESOURCE > and completion") > > Now that if get budget ever failed, block layer will make sure to > trigger new run queue for the hctx. Hence there is no need to run queue > from scsi layer in this case. > Does anyone has suggestions about this patch? More info why I tried to remove this: while testing megaraid with 4 nvme with none elevator, the default queue_depth is 128, while I test it with fio 128 jobs and 1 iodepth, bw is about 4Gib/s, however, if I test with 128 jobs and 2 iodepth, bw is decreased to about 0.8Gib/s, and with this patch applied, bw can stay 4Gib/s in the later case. Thanks, Kuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists