lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221126094530.226629-2-yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:45:27 +0800
From:   Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
        <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <song@...nel.org>, <yhs@...com>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>, <sdf@...gle.com>,
        <haoluo@...gle.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        <illusionist.neo@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <mykolal@...com>, <shuah@...nel.org>,
        <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, <memxor@...il.com>,
        <colin.i.king@...il.com>, <asavkov@...hat.com>, <delyank@...com>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext extension

For ARM32 architecture, if data width of kfunc return value is 32 bits,
need to do explicit zero extension for high 32-bit, insn_def_regno should
return dst_reg for BPF_JMP type of BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL. Otherwise,
opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32 returns -EFAULT, resulting in BPF failure.

Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 264b3dc714cc..193ea927aa69 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1927,6 +1927,21 @@ find_kfunc_desc(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 func_id, u16 offset)
 		       sizeof(tab->descs[0]), kfunc_desc_cmp_by_id_off);
 }
 
+static int kfunc_desc_cmp_by_imm(const void *a, const void *b);
+
+static const struct bpf_kfunc_desc *
+find_kfunc_desc_by_imm(const struct bpf_prog *prog, s32 imm)
+{
+	struct bpf_kfunc_desc desc = {
+		.imm = imm,
+	};
+	struct bpf_kfunc_desc_tab *tab;
+
+	tab = prog->aux->kfunc_tab;
+	return bsearch(&desc, tab->descs, tab->nr_descs,
+		       sizeof(tab->descs[0]), kfunc_desc_cmp_by_imm);
+}
+
 static struct btf *__find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 					 s16 offset)
 {
@@ -2342,6 +2357,13 @@ static bool is_reg64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			 */
 			if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
 				return false;
+
+			/* Kfunc call will reach here because of insn_has_def32,
+			 * conservatively return TRUE.
+			 */
+			if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL)
+				return true;
+
 			/* Helper call will reach here because of arg type
 			 * check, conservatively return TRUE.
 			 */
@@ -2405,10 +2427,26 @@ static bool is_reg64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 }
 
 /* Return the regno defined by the insn, or -1. */
-static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+static int insn_def_regno(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
 	switch (BPF_CLASS(insn->code)) {
 	case BPF_JMP:
+		if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL) {
+			const struct bpf_kfunc_desc *desc;
+
+			/* The value of desc cannot be NULL */
+			desc = find_kfunc_desc_by_imm(env->prog, insn->imm);
+
+			/* A kfunc can return void.
+			 * The btf type of the kfunc's return value needs
+			 * to be checked against "void" first
+			 */
+			if (desc->func_model.ret_size == 0)
+				return -1;
+			else
+				return insn->dst_reg;
+		}
+		fallthrough;
 	case BPF_JMP32:
 	case BPF_ST:
 		return -1;
@@ -2430,7 +2468,7 @@ static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 /* Return TRUE if INSN has defined any 32-bit value explicitly. */
 static bool insn_has_def32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
-	int dst_reg = insn_def_regno(insn);
+	int dst_reg = insn_def_regno(env, insn);
 
 	if (dst_reg == -1)
 		return false;
@@ -13335,7 +13373,7 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		int load_reg;
 
 		insn = insns[adj_idx];
-		load_reg = insn_def_regno(&insn);
+		load_reg = insn_def_regno(env, &insn);
 		if (!aux[adj_idx].zext_dst) {
 			u8 code, class;
 			u32 imm_rnd;
-- 
2.30.GIT

Powered by blists - more mailing lists