linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] powerpc/85xx: Mark mpc85xx_ds_pic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221126162550.r4rhg5ud2e5vxzot@pali>
Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:25:50 +0100
From:   Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, Sinan Akman <sinan@...teme.com>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] powerpc/85xx: Mark mpc85xx_ds_pic_init() as static

On Wednesday 02 November 2022 00:25:03 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 16 October 2022 16:59:53 Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Le 16/10/2022 à 13:05, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> > > Hello Christophe! Do you have any other comments for this patch series?
> > 
> > I'm AFK for two weeks, but as far as I remember I don't have any more 
> > comments.
> 
> Hello! When you are back, could you look at my feedback to your comments?

PING?

> > > 
> > > On Monday 26 September 2022 11:47:06 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >> On Monday 26 September 2022 09:43:55 Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > >>> Le 19/08/2022 à 21:15, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> > >>>> Function mpc85xx_ds_pic_init() is not used out of the mpc85xx_ds.c file.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> > >>>
> > >>> This patch should be squashed into patch 1.
> > >>
> > >> No problem. Just to explain that I split those changes into different
> > >> patches because they touch different files and different board code.
> > >> And I thought that different things should be in different patches.
> > >>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>>    arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c | 2 +-
> > >>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
> > >>>> index f8d2c97f39bd..9a6d637ef54a 100644
> > >>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
> > >>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c
> > >>>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void mpc85xx_8259_cascade(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > >>>>    }
> > >>>>    #endif	/* CONFIG_PPC_I8259 */
> > >>>>    
> > >>>> -void __init mpc85xx_ds_pic_init(void)
> > >>>> +static void __init mpc85xx_ds_pic_init(void)
> > >>>>    {
> > >>>>    	struct mpic *mpic;
> > >>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_I8259