lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f2b2b8da209a9cf22e80b089a698f78dd5c2f5fb.camel@intel.com> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 00:43:24 +0800 From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>, 'Kajetan Puchalski' <kajetan.puchalski@....com>, rafael@...nel.org Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, lukasz.luba@....com, Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, yu.chen.surf@...il.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] cpuidle: teo: Introduce util-awareness > > Workflow: sleeping ebizzy 128 threads. > > Variable: interval (uSecs). > > Performance Results: > > http://smythies.com/~doug/linux/idle/teo-util/graphs/ebizzy-128-perf.png > > Performance power and idle data: > > http://smythies.com/~doug/linux/idle/teo-util/ebizzy/perf/ > > for the "Idle state 0/1/2/3 was too deep" graphs, may I know how you > assert that an idle state is too deep/shallow? > is this got from the cpu_idle_miss trace event? thanks, rui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists