[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3dbfae56-918f-d850-11b4-5c98e3baae05@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 16:11:26 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rcu 12/16] scsi/scsi_error: Use call_rcu_flush()
instead of call_rcu()
On 11/21/22 17:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 6995c89792300..634672e67c81f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ void scsi_eh_scmd_add(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> * Ensure that all tasks observe the host state change before the
> * host_failed change.
> */
> - call_rcu(&scmd->rcu, scsi_eh_inc_host_failed);
> + call_rcu_flush(&scmd->rcu, scsi_eh_inc_host_failed);
> }
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists