lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0a8264a8-e2a9-952a-97ce-a7f06920ad39@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 09:59:06 +0800 From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com> To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> CC: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "Chris Mason" <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] fs: clear a UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning On 2022/11/26 5:00, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 05:13:56PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >> v2 --> v3: >> Updated the commit message of patch 2/2 based on Alexander Viro's suggestion. > > Not exactly what I meant... I've tentatively applied it, with the Haha, I felt like something was missing yesterday, too. But as far as my English level is concerned, I usually copy the words suggested by others directly. > following commit message: Thanks. > > -------------------------------- > get rid of INT_LIMIT, use type_max() instead > > INT_LIMIT() tries to do what type_max() does, except that type_max() > doesn't rely upon undefined behaviour[*], might as well use type_max() > instead. > > [*] if T is an N-bit signed integer type, the maximal value in T is > pow(2, N - 1) - 1, all right, but naive expression for that value > ends up with a couple of wraparounds and as usual for wraparounds > in signed types, that's an undefined behaviour. type_max() takes > care to avoid those... > > Caught-by: UBSAN > Suggested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com> > Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> > -------------------------------- > > Does anybody have objections against the commit message above? Looks good to me. > > . > -- Regards, Zhen Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists