[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221128134741.668fe1b7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:47:41 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the devicetree
tree
Hi all,
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 12:49:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/addac/adi,ad74413r.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
> c9adc3bd1180 ("dt-bindings: Remove "status" from schema examples, again")
>
> from the devicetree tree and commit:
>
> a4728fe6b58b ("dt-bindings: iio: addac: adi,ad74413r: improve example")
>
> from the iio tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the latter whic included the former change
> to this file) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as
> far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and the devicetree
tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists