[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221128030320.GA101008@k08j02272.eu95sqa>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:03:20 +0800
From: "Hou Wenlong" <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware)" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/paravirt: Use relative reference for original
instruction
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 09:24:34AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On November 24, 2022 3:51:53 AM PST, Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com> wrote:
> >Similar to the alternative patching, use relative reference for original
> >instruction rather than absolute one, which saves 8 bytes for one entry
> >on x86_64. And it could generate R_X86_64_PC32 relocation instead of
> >R_X86_64_64 relocation, which also reduces relocation metadata on
> >relocatable builds. And the alignment could be hard coded to be 4 now.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>
> >---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 10 +++++-----
> > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 8 ++++----
> > arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 8 +++++---
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
> >index 2851bc2339d5..e56065ea73f2 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
> >+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
> >@@ -735,16 +735,16 @@ extern void default_banner(void);
> >
> > #else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> >
> >-#define _PVSITE(ptype, ops, word, algn) \
> >+#define _PVSITE(ptype, ops) \
> > 771:; \
> > ops; \
> > 772:; \
> > .pushsection .parainstructions,"a"; \
> >- .align algn; \
> >- word 771b; \
> >+ .align 4; \
> >+ .long 771b-.; \
> > .byte ptype; \
> > .byte 772b-771b; \
> >- _ASM_ALIGN; \
> >+ .align 4; \
> > .popsection
> >
> >
> >@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ extern void default_banner(void);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
> >
> > #define PARA_PATCH(off) ((off) / 8)
> >-#define PARA_SITE(ptype, ops) _PVSITE(ptype, ops, .quad, 8)
> >+#define PARA_SITE(ptype, ops) _PVSITE(ptype, ops)
> > #define PARA_INDIRECT(addr) *addr(%rip)
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
> >index 8c1da419260f..68952ae07a3f 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
> >+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
> >@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > /* These all sit in the .parainstructions section to tell us what to patch. */
> > struct paravirt_patch_site {
> >- u8 *instr; /* original instructions */
> >+ s32 instr_offset; /* original instructions */
> > u8 type; /* type of this instruction */
> > u8 len; /* length of original instruction */
> > };
> >@@ -273,11 +273,11 @@ extern struct paravirt_patch_template pv_ops;
> > #define _paravirt_alt(insn_string, type) \
> > "771:\n\t" insn_string "\n" "772:\n" \
> > ".pushsection .parainstructions,\"a\"\n" \
> >- _ASM_ALIGN "\n" \
> >- _ASM_PTR " 771b\n" \
> >+ " .align 4\n" \
> >+ " .long 771b-.\n" \
> > " .byte " type "\n" \
> > " .byte 772b-771b\n" \
> >- _ASM_ALIGN "\n" \
> >+ " .align 4\n" \
> > ".popsection\n"
> >
> > /* Generate patchable code, with the default asm parameters. */
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> >index 111b809f0ac2..6eea563a098d 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> >@@ -1232,20 +1232,22 @@ void __init_or_module apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch_site *start,
> > {
> > struct paravirt_patch_site *p;
> > char insn_buff[MAX_PATCH_LEN];
> >+ u8 *instr;
> >
> > for (p = start; p < end; p++) {
> > unsigned int used;
> >
> >+ instr = (u8 *)&p->instr_offset + p->instr_offset;
> > BUG_ON(p->len > MAX_PATCH_LEN);
> > /* prep the buffer with the original instructions */
> >- memcpy(insn_buff, p->instr, p->len);
> >- used = paravirt_patch(p->type, insn_buff, (unsigned long)p->instr, p->len);
> >+ memcpy(insn_buff, instr, p->len);
> >+ used = paravirt_patch(p->type, insn_buff, (unsigned long)instr, p->len);
> >
> > BUG_ON(used > p->len);
> >
> > /* Pad the rest with nops */
> > add_nops(insn_buff + used, p->len - used);
> >- text_poke_early(p->instr, insn_buff, p->len);
> >+ text_poke_early(instr, insn_buff, p->len);
> > }
> > }
> > extern struct paravirt_patch_site __start_parainstructions[],
>
> Any reason that you couldn't use the same patching code?
Sorry, what do you mean using the same patching code? Do you
mean that share some code between apply_alternatives() and
apply_paravirt()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists